Reboot Alberta

Saturday, May 31, 2008

Pay Politicians Well - and Pay the "Little People" Better!

I don’t begrudge the Alberta Premier, Cabinet Ministers and other elected representatives getting “healthy” raises. Let’s face it if you pay peanuts you get monkeys. I don't want to be governed by monkeys - regardless of party affiliation.

Now will they do the same for the lowest paid people in our work force? I am talking about the working poor who work in the social service sectors. What about paying a livable wage and benefits to those folks who take care of our developmentally disabled citizens, our at-risk and troubled children and our frail and fragile senior citizens who work in the not-for-profit community based service provider agencies.

Mr. Premier, during the election you never mentioned wage hikes for elected people. However you did promise to narrow the wage gap between these people and the equivalent work done by Alberta's civil servants. True more money has been put towards staff retention efforts but it is ad hoc and one-time band-aids. A more systemic and long-term commitment to closing this gap is required if people are going to stay in the social services sector.

So far with your government's union settlements and signing bonuses and increased staff benefits, the gap is wider than ever - even with the ad hoc one-time payments. What is worse, some PDD Boards have been very slow to get into the hands of agencies and employees. So much for crisis control and urgency.

I believe our elected representatives should be paid well, very well in fact. After all they are potentially more important to our well being and long term quality of life than hockey players who can make millions of dollars a year and they have about the same shelf life as a politician.

Now Alberta has pony up and honour, respect and compensate the “little people” who do the difficult and often dirty work we need done to care for the most vulnerable in our society. Quit the delay and the deflection of the issues Premier Stelmach. Pay the working poor in community based agencies a wage that can support a family. You do it for unionized employees why not the rest of the people who work in the sector in non-profit community based agencies?

Maybe that is the message the Progressive Conservative government is sending these folks. Perhaps your government is saying they should “join a union” and pick a fight if they want to be treated fairly and with respect. I hope that is not the message you intend to be sending these working poor. What else can they do to get the attention, respect of government. Remember the responsibility to take care of the vulnerable Albertans serviced by these workers is ultimately the government's.

These people need a significant raise, just like you and your colleagues just got sir. They need enough money and benefits to live in our expensive Alberta. Is it too much for such workers to expect to be financially secure enough to to actually enjoy the so-called " Alberta advantage?"

Congratulations on your raise Mr. Premier. It was the right thing to do. Now take that same philosophy one step further and show the same concern for the working poor who are doing some of the most important and most thankless (next to a politician) jobs in our society.

8 comments:

  1. Anonymous2:14 pm

    I really liked this post Ken, it is clear that you are passionate about this cause and dare I say it your words are almost Tommy Douglas-esque. Unfortunately you make one very problematic statement.

    show the same concern for the working poor who are doing some of the most important and most thankless (next to a politician) jobs in our society.

    Do you really think that being an elected (PC) official in Alberta is completely thankless? Moreover do you really think that PC politicians have more thankless jobs than the working poor you describe that occupy social service provider positions? I'd say the salaries of PC politicians and the social capital that accompanies being a somebody in the PC party makes them set for life in this province.

    Who are the fat cats and who are the mice here?

    ReplyDelete
  2. What you say about the relative social capital comparisons is true. Cats and mice are different species and the comparisons are tough to make.

    I spend a great deal of time with politicians and in the world of politics and policy design. I know how thankless and difficult the job is. To do it well is a skill few of us have.

    The abundance of belittling, badgering and bullshit they put up with is extreme. The lack of respect they have from the public, media and others is unfortunately well deserved by some but they are few and far between.

    We need our best brightest, wisest and most conscientious and courageous citizens to take on the governance role in our society. The criteria is not about the best educated, the richest or the most articulate who we need show up. Those are talents but they do not guarantee that the necessary governance skills will follow.

    Short answer (I know it is way too late for that) I stand by my statement. thx for the comment eh.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous3:54 pm

    Yes, Ken Chapman and the socialist Tommy Douglas certainly have a lot in common.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous4:00 pm

    Thank heavens you are not our premier or we would have the highest taxes in North America. Of course everyone feels compassionate towards the less fortunate. Unfortunately, we also have to grow our economy - Stelmach cannot hamper our economy with more liberal taxes (especially if Dion's massive carbon tax somehow makes it into legislation).

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous2:20 am

    I wish the conservative party's sock-puppets would at least have the intelligence to wait til the plan was actually out before trying to categorize the plan as massive.

    Of course, Ken's good friend Stelmach, who so richly deserves his pay raise, never did tell us where he pulled the 300,000 job-loss number from, or even those 30,000 birds that hit wind turbines every year. But hey, I guess it costs a lot to elect a good liar these days.

    Now if only his raise had as much substance as his other numbers. Then it might be justified.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous8:54 pm

    Left v.s. right, socialist v.s. capitalists, liberal v.s. conservative, are all the wrong metrics for informed policy debate folks. Comparing Ken to Tommy is useless to me unless you are trying to say your related to McCarthy!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous2:53 pm

    Could we suggest to Stelmach that we don't really want raises, we want
    the same 35% "Adjustment" he gave himself and his colleagues? After
    all, raises appear to conjur up a "merit" concept. "Adjustments" are
    simply corrections of a earlier calculation error.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous2:58 pm

    no wonder the system is screwup. should they not get into government to do sometihng. instead to many look at as a career. no wonder most of them give up their belirfs so easily. oh by the way alberta already has a liberal government. if you want a real conservative government . you should put ted morton in a real conservative unlike ed ralph or harper. they are afraid ti run as a real conservative yes even in alberta

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous comments are discouraged. If you have something to say, the rest of us have to know who you are