There is lots of moving ground beneath the political feet of Premier Stelmach these days. The big shift in PC party power base to the north and Edmonton from its “natural” place of Calgary and the deep south has caused great angst in Cowtown. This anxiety is "true" even though in Calgary they have three Cabinet Ministers compared to Edmonton’s one.
Budget 2007, the biggest spending budget in Alberta history was put together in 60 days and is suffering from some spotty execution. We are seeing this particularly in areas like municipal infrastructure funding coming with strings that are seen as forcing inter-municipal “co-operation.” As a result we have the Mayor of Calgary leading the charge over claims of broken promises. Even the distribution the funds using the assessment base make Counties happy and anger the Towns. The Counties gets most of the cash for the “co-operation projects” but the Towns have the infrastructure pressures. We all know the Golden Rule. He who has the gold makes the rules. This is not likely to be a winning formula for fostering any true town and county infrastructure co-operation...I could be wrong and hope I am...but time will tell.
There was too little budget bounce for what is needed to meet public service provider wage levels to stop the Diaspora of skilled workers in the disabilities sectors departing to the oil patch so they can make a living wage. For the record I am working on this issue. Staffing shortages and turn over in the disability private non-profit service sector is averaging 40% and some citizens with disabilities are going to suffer serious harm if this is not fixed and quickly.
Then there is the "minor" matter of ticking off the teachers in the Budget by tying a $25M supplement to pension fund payments as condition to labour peace. That is flying in the face of the Premier saying they would be separate issues during the leadership campaign. Expect work to rule job action from teachers this fall…and parents to be super ticked by October.
The affordable housing efforts have been sidetracked into a political football as shelter cost are soaring due to market demands and poor planning by the past regime. The environment has been given short shrift and oil sands management tie to growth is a concern. The resource royalty rates review is starting now but they are facing a monumentally complex job and have to report with recommendations by August 31.
Then we have the pure political plays. The recent Ethics Commissioner Report on the misguided scheme of the Stelmach campaign volunteers to sell access for $5k a pop to cover campaign deficits was found not to be illegal but not prudent either. The anonymous campaign contributions of leadership candidates was frowned up (to be euphemistic) by the Party membership at the recent PC Party AGM too.
Scads of public consultations are going on all over the province. They are aimed at reporting in the fall and positioning for a possible spring 2008 general election. This all add to the pressures and helps to keep the political footing tricky as the policy and political ground seems to be moving constantly.
Then we have the by-elections set for June 12. Framed as a litmus test for Stelmach’s leadership in Calgary circles it has some interesting dynamics. CalgaryGrit has an interesting take on how the story goes if the PCs drop Calgary Elbow. If the Liberals win it, that is somehow the end of the PC world. That is true if you are so Calgary centric that you think Calgary IS Alberta. It used to be the case but Alberta became a more balanced and interesting place when Stelmach won the PC leadership. Calgary obviously has some serious issues and now it will have some interesting politics. PC MLAs in Calgary will have to win seats on their own merit and not ride on the coat-tails of the leader any more. It has been that way for decades in Edmonton since Premier Getty lost his seat to a Liberal, the late Percy Wickman. It will result in better government and governance in the end.
Calgary Elbow is Ralph Klein’s old seat. Rod Love says the PC could lose it in this by-election and he is right. We lost Calgary Varsity to the Liberals in 2004 right after Murray Smith “retired” and went to Washington DC and he was a very popular Calgary PC politician. That should have been the wake up call to the Calgary PCs. The PCs in New Brunswick immediately lost former Premier Bernard Lord’s seat when he retired from politics. So it happens and yes, it could happen again. What does such a change mean in a by-election though…other than the usual chance to “send the government a message?”
Albertans in general, and Progressive Conservatives in particular, have been too complacent too long. We have been benignly presumptive that tomorrow will be an extension of yesterday so planning was seen as simply unnecessary. We seemed to believe this myth even when all the evidence we could see emerging belied those presumptions. Evidence like massive oils sands investment and development, the Edmonton-Calgary Corridor growth phenomenon and chronic labour shortages plus the implications of many other indicators were ignored.
Any partisan change in the by-elections on June 12 will only be meaningful if the voter participation rates exceed 50%. If people stay home and do not show up we may well see some changes. They will be based on local campaign dynamics and by-election realities, but they do not necessarily make a trend. Any local by-election change in party representation will be a wake up call for the PCs particularly if they lose Calgary Elbow to the Liberals and Drumheller-Stettler to the Alliance. All politics are local and by-elections are the epitome of that truism.
In the meantime Premier Stelmach has some refocusing and serious short term fixing to do based on sound principles of good government and long term planning not just the short game of partisan politics. He is very capable but he best get at it. Change is in the air...his election as Progressive Conservative leader has already proven that...but that was just the beginning. No doubt there are lots more changes yet to come so it is time to get ahead of the curve and design the changes - or sit back and be devoured by them.
Ken:
ReplyDeleteI may be simplistic in my views, but I can truly sense a change in the political feelings of the regular Provincial constituents. I have posted some thoughts here (http://www.richfulllife.ca/my_weblog/2007/05/i_miss_ralph.html) and would like your thoughts.
Cheers,
Chris LaBossiere
Whose 'We'? As in "We lost Calgary Varsity to the Liberals"
ReplyDeleteHi Eugene - "We" is the Calgary PCs in that constituency.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately for Stelmach he is going suffer the damage caused by the inept Klein years. Albertans are realizing that the oil is being given away, huge spending budgets are running away and we have no infrastructure to show for it.
ReplyDeletePeople liked Klein because they could have a beer with him (what a ridiculous and untrue belief). But The last 13 years have been a financial disaster for Alberta. Cutting without a plan, insane 1 penny royalty scheme and now the bitumen and jobs are going south.
The boom is benefitting outside workers and american shareholders. Albertans are left with deficient infrastructure.
Stelmach cannot hope to fix this over night and Albertans will defeat him because of it.
Anon - your observatoins as to why we are in this mess today is right from my perspective.
ReplyDeleteYou could be right about the electoral consequences for Stelmach too, but it is still too early to tell.
That said Getty left Klein in a political pickle like 17% in the polls as I recall - but he figured a way forward.
The single minded focus on debt and deficit created a political euphoria that got carried away with itself...that is the down side of "charismatic" politics.(sic)
Good Post Ken,
ReplyDeleteHowever i think your wrong when you say
"This anxiety is "true" even though in Calgary they have three Cabinet Ministers compared to Edmonton’s one." ..... I think this is wrong on 2 accounts. Par of the anxiety comes from the two cities having 2/3 of the population of the province but only 1/6 the seats. The other issue i have with that statement which im sure youve heard before.... 3/20 is alot less then 1/3 interms of cabinet postings... I don't agree with bronco.. but on the other hand I dont agree Calgarians should just suck it up and be happy.
Patrick - I agree with you on the rural - urban seat split being a bigger issue but the Calgary/Edmonton ratio comparison 3/20 vs 1/3 is not a strong argument.
ReplyDeleteRatios and averages usually mean a smokescreen is at play. Cabinet representation is about power and influence. The "power of one" is often at play in these situations too but at least a Calgary Cabinet member can count on 2 more allies.
That said if ratios are important to you consider rep-by-pop, which is your urban-rural split argument. Calgary has 1 Cabinet Minister for every 335K voters and Edmonton has 1 for every 750K voters.
Ken:
ReplyDeleteVery perspective piece indeed. I can tell you that the problem is not the Premier who is extremely intelligent and is a sponge for information. The problem is that he is not getting that information from his key staff. The long-range vision is missing. Issues are being dealt incrementally on a one and one basis, within an crisis management orientation rather than through the prism of a lonvision.
The government has to become move proactive rather than reactive or it is certain that seats will be lost in Calgary and some of the smaller urban centres such as Fort McMurray, Grande Praire, Red Deer and Lethbridge during the next election. Not enough to threaten majority government status, but a much larger Opposition.
In my opinion, the Premier's Office is dysfunctional. The policy shop is not functioning well and the communications, particularly with key media, is atrocious. I recognize the Premier is loyal to his key political staff, but political survival means he will have to make some tough decisions. The people who are letting the Premier down know who they are, the issue is whether they will do the honourable thing and step down to allow the Premier to bring in the people he needs to steady the ship.
This reminds me of the Getty's Premier's Office, circa 1992. I would appreciate your comments, Ken.
It is not the Premier - for sure...loyalty clouds vision.
ReplyDeleteWe could do without Boutilier in Ft Mc too..even if the seat was lost.
Election readiness has also atrophied over the past ten years. Under Premier Klein, there was no need to keep up to date on the latest voter contact technologies: E-contact, E-fundrasing, targeting, polling and focus group, web site interactiveness, etc.
ReplyDeleteKlein was able to win elections based on his the cult of his own personality. Premier Stelmach is a very good man, but personality is not is strong suit, although he is excellent in one on one engagements. Unfortunately, he will not be able to meet all 2.5 million voters in 30 days so the party needs to beef up its voter contact technologies.
Whomever fills the role of Executive Director of the PCPA will be critical in this regard. I'm glad that Mark Norris was not selected to become exeutive director as firt rumoured. I agreed with the executive search decision, but the length of time it has taken to fill the position is worrisome. It makes pulling the pin in the fall of 2007 a virtual no go. Even spring 2008 will be difficult. There is a lot of work to be done over at PCPA to revitalize election readiness. This will take a great deal of time and effort.
Anon @ 2:21 am - You make some very good points on lack of election readiness in the party and the complacency that has been the culture for a decade.
ReplyDeletePart of that was too much control of the party apparatus in the past coming from the Premier's office. I expect that is changing under a more democratic leader like Ed Stelmach.
We have the resources to modernize our party machinery but do we have the will? We have the wake up call with 200,000 fewer PC supporters in the last election.
Alberta is the most wired place in the country I am told yet we only have email adresses for 20% of our membership!!! What gives?
As for applying modern networking techniques, I hope the youth members just start doing it amongst themselves and the rest of us will follow along.
Mentorship was a hot topic and the AGM session I moderated on engaging youth in politics. I made the point that the mentorship works both ways and youth needs to mentor older members on the use and potential of technology in a political context.
I know how valuble that mentorship is from youth on helping long time memebers (not "old") to modernize. If it were not for a few young PC members mentoring and encouraging me in the recent Leadership campaign I would never have started this Blog.
I would never have know how much fun I was missing.