Here is what voter indifference can do to the future of Alberta. We are already deeply into election mode and it will be apparent after New Years. Unless our provincial political agenda changes, we can anticipate a continuation of voter apathy. This is due to the disconnect between modern machine politics and the concerns of real people who are leading real lives and facing real issues.
What if politics does not change and the cynicism and scepticism continue as the dominant political response? Well I don’t have a worst possible partisan political scenario because that really depends on your point of view and your party affiliation.
I do however have a sense of consequences of lost and bungled opportunities for the province as well as the potential for some serious political mistakes to be made…by anyone and everyone in the running.
I think citizen indifference and voter apathy is the biggest threat to mature democracies. Apathy and indifference is not only the fault of the citizens. The political system has to take much of the blame. For those fans of proportional representation, stifle yourselves. It is not a cure…it is more likely to add complications to the affliction and erode the necessary capacity for effective on-going governing.
Here is what I think can happen as a consequence of citizen apathy and voter indifference. It is entirely possible we could end up with new leadership races in the PC, Alberta Liberals and the NDP in 2008. If that were to happen we would have squandered the opportunity for meaningful change and will set Alberta on a course of least 2 more years of drift and dissonance.
Here is my armchair quarterbacking that drives Alberta to that result. There is a PC repeat and amplification of the 2004 and the recent Calgary by election phenomenon. The far right goes to the Alliance and other marginal parties weakening the rural stronghold of the PCs. They are spread thinly and make no real electoral inroads.
What if politics does not change and the cynicism and scepticism continue as the dominant political response? Well I don’t have a worst possible partisan political scenario because that really depends on your point of view and your party affiliation.
I do however have a sense of consequences of lost and bungled opportunities for the province as well as the potential for some serious political mistakes to be made…by anyone and everyone in the running.
I think citizen indifference and voter apathy is the biggest threat to mature democracies. Apathy and indifference is not only the fault of the citizens. The political system has to take much of the blame. For those fans of proportional representation, stifle yourselves. It is not a cure…it is more likely to add complications to the affliction and erode the necessary capacity for effective on-going governing.
Here is what I think can happen as a consequence of citizen apathy and voter indifference. It is entirely possible we could end up with new leadership races in the PC, Alberta Liberals and the NDP in 2008. If that were to happen we would have squandered the opportunity for meaningful change and will set Alberta on a course of least 2 more years of drift and dissonance.
Here is my armchair quarterbacking that drives Alberta to that result. There is a PC repeat and amplification of the 2004 and the recent Calgary by election phenomenon. The far right goes to the Alliance and other marginal parties weakening the rural stronghold of the PCs. They are spread thinly and make no real electoral inroads.
The progressives stay home in disgust or show up in anger and send a message to the powers that be by parking their ballots with the Greens. Why the Greens? It is perceived as a safe parking place because it does not help the Liberals directly and sends a strong message to the PCs that the policy agenda is dated. Women and youth who do show up will be angry as well and go to the Greens too. This will be a protest vote about the relevance and priorities of the public policy agenda and mainline party platforms.
The consequence is a PC minority government. That means the knives are going to be out for Stelmach for obvious reasons. The Alberta Liberals will benefit from more seats but they are also going to be after Taft’s head too. Because he would be seen as unsuccessful and ineffective in going for the kill and gaining the political power he ought to have realized in the face of an "obviously weakened" PC party.
The Greens don’t even have to elect anyone to be seen as winners. They get a big bump in popular vote and due to protests, anger and ballot parking they rival or perhaps even surpass the NDP popular vote. That will strike fear in the hearts of the Alberta NDP and been seen across the country as a foreshadowing of what may happen to the Dippers in the forthcoming federal election too. Brian Mason’s leadership also gets challenged as a result.
A PC minority government in March of 2008 will likely results in three political party leadership campaigns by late 2008. Who knows what the outcomes of those exercises will be? One thing for sure is if this happens any semblance of real governing will be suspended for at least another year. A lack of governing focus and capacity could roll over well into 2010 and beyond as another election will undoubtedly happen sooner than later.
Uncertainty then becomes the new normal in Alberta. Not a good thing and nothing we are very used to. Frankly I don't see this happening if the political parties, particularly the PCs, get their acts together and become relevant to the lives of Albertans again.
One thing for sure though, even without this perfect storm scenario, Alberta politics are guaranteed to be interesting for the first time in a long time.
Interesting post as always, Ken.
ReplyDeleteI definetly concur with the feeling that voters are more "up for grabs" than we've seen in a long time.
I disagree, though, that "modern machine politics" are to blame. We see modern machine politics at work on the federal scene, particularily with the Conservative Party of Canada. Provincially in Alberta, though, I think "modern machine politics" are sorely lacking amongst all of the major parties.
Many of us would love to drag party operations/election planning into the 21st century and are making some progress, but I think that suggesting that PC Alberta is a modern political machine is exceptionally generous.
I agree BR the PC Party in Alberta is a long way off anything even close rudimentary internet based political capacity never mind mastering Web 2.0.
ReplyDeleteWhat I was thinking more about when using the phrase "modern machine politics" was the shrink wrapped media trained, talking-points focused candidates who repeat muddle-of-the-road stump speeches like some kind of closed loop political Muzak.
Afraid to make a mistake due to media deciding a happy "scream" or a dropped football or wearing a hairnet in a food processing plant disqualifies someone from becoming elected and providing effective public service.
We therefore get a purre of focused-group "tested" pap posturing as policy platforms in our election campaigns. We measure the progress of campaigns using "opinion poll" that give results that are often vapid, misleading and usually focused on the irrelevant.
The campaign focus on polls is like only watching the puck and not the game. I think campaign polls are like lobotomys, they alter perceptions with changing behaviours. My favourite bumper sticker is still "Save Democracy, Lie to a Pollster."
The inevitable betrayal of the citizen becomes obvious and often when contrary policy decisions are made for pragmatic reasons - usualy right after leaders achieve power.
It is all so much like a "Through The Looking Glass meets Kafka" kind of reality. I don't want to see candidates belching, scratching and farting their way through a campaign but I think we can presume they are human and therefore somewhat mistake prone but educatable and adaptable.
So we should cut them some significant amount of slack and take some time ourselves to delve into their misspeakings and seek out their meaning and accept their amendments without calling them flip flops.
How realisitic is it that candidates are expected to respond as if they knew everything about everything? Then we expect them to explain every complex inter-related and integrated issue in 15 seconds of "newsworthy" sound bites for the convenience the attention deficit media.
Dumbed down campaigns distilled to mediated charisma contests are as insulting to democracy as the swimsuit and "talent" aspects of "beauty contests" are to women.
I am sick of them.
Unlike federally, the provincial NDPs have no money. The Greens are unorganized and do not have any star candidates. Both of these parties will not play a role in the next election - and as always, people will equate the provincials with the fed liberals.
ReplyDeleteAnon - you are not getting my point. The Greens don't need money, star candidates or even organization to be a parking lot for disgruntled voters.
ReplyDeleteBeing a parking lot will show the Greens can have an impact on election outcomes. It will not translate into core or expanding support for them going forward. Greens will have to earn that but that too will come with time and opinion trends.
It is because the Greens don't have any of those usual trappings that some voters who want to send a real message to the powers that be and tht aspire to be. They will park votes with the Greens - federally and provincially.
It is pointless to not show up and vote if you wnat to send a message. If voters are ticked with the way things are and don't like the policy and leadership offerings they need to show up to register their dissatisfaction with the main-line parties.
I expect they will do so and park votes with the Greens. Some may intentionally spoil ballots but that does not show up in the reporting results so it is a waste of ones angst.
Al this means is the main-line parties have to get real again. the writing is on the Alberta political wall for the first time in a long time.
Premier Stelmach has the right attitude when he says governing is a priviledge that has to be earned.