There is a very interesting Calgary Herald story today “Tory Landslide Worries Oilpatch” noting the continued “uneasiness in the oilpatch and unhappiness with the Tory government” and what is being called “the big disconnect.” The oil patch need not worry - but is has some adapting to do with Stelmach acknowledging that the "environment trumps the economy."
There is indeed a BIG disconnected but it is not only between the energy elites in Calgary and the Stelmach government. It is also between the energy sector and the citizenry and their expectations of their government performing its responsibility as stewards of our natural resources and environment. The oilpatch is in the centre of all of these BIG disconnects. It has to look in the mirror and realize it does not own the oil and gas. They are only licensees from the Alberta public, the real owners of the assets. The energy sector’s access license to operate is one thing but it also carries a duty of a social license to operate too. The former does not transfer ownership and the latter duty is a delegated responsibility to serve the common good – as well as shareholder interests. Jobs are only part of the social license duty. Using the best available environmental practices and technologies, and timely and effective reclamation, protection of wildlife habitat and being a good neighbor in the communities where they operate are other elements of a social license obligation on private enterprise.
There is a philosophical reluctance in conservative governments towards interfering in the marketplace. It is a philosophy I share. We know it does not work, and hence the “not touching the brakes” comments of Premier Stelmach.
We have lost billions of taxpayer’s dollars in the Getty era through government intervention in private enterprise, trying to pick winners and losers. The need for private enterprise to have as much certainty as possible is a responsibility of good government too.
However, uncertainty takes many forms, from interest rates, commodity prices, exchange rates, economic cycles, geo-political events, competition for materials and manpower, inflation, skills shortages are just some of the uncertainty influences at play in the Alberta economy. Royalty rates are a minor influence overall and they are being overplayed in the larger scheme of things.
Not touching the brakes does not mean retreating from setting and collecting a fair economic rent for non-renewable royalties. It does not mean being lax on updating environmental and enforcing regulations on industry. I think successive Alberta governments have lapsed into a resting on our laurels attitude about the environment. We were the first jurisdiction in Canada to originate a Department of the Environment…fine but are we still at the leading edge in terms of policy and practices for conservation of our water, land and air as well as biodiversity and habitat?
Are we the stewardship leaders we ought to be in areas like responsible and sustainable growth that not only protect the environment but actually enhances it as we grow and create wealth? No we are not…and there is no reason why we should not be other than where we put our attention and focus. As the home of the oil sands and the primary beneficiaries of that enormous and complex resource, I think there is an obligation upon Albertans to be environmental and ecological leaders.
Premier Stelmach also said “the environment trumps the economy” and he was right then too. When our government exercises its stewardship responsibility in serving that greater ecological responsibility with goals that stretch us and engage us, it will in fact impact our economy. Proper ecological stewardship by our government on our behalf may even “slow down” the growth or at least stretch out the development cycles so we can actually adjust and achieve the environmental advancements we need. These economic consequences will not be unintended and they can be planned. They will not be the result governments inappropriately interfering the in the marketplace. Rather it will be putting business and the marketplace in its proper perspective as in service of the needs of our society, and not the other way as seems to be the way it works presently.
These are some of the BIG disconnect challenges the Stelmach government faces but can address with its powerful mandate. I hope Premier Stelmach elevates the role and scope of the Department of the Environment and Sustainable Resource Development. It also must increase the accountability and effectiveness of the Department of Energy in meetings its responsibility as the regulator of the energy sector in Alberta. The overarching duty of the Department of Energy is to serve the benefit of Albertans now and future generations…not just be the advocate for the oil patch, as has been its wont.
I don't think they should be interfering with the marketplace either: case in point, if people don't care to spend money on horse racing then why should taxpayers pay to prop it up?
ReplyDeleteBut to the main issue: I actually tuned in to Rutherford (I know, I know) on the web this morning, he had an oil chap from Calgary on. Like many of Dave's guests, they are selected on the basis that they will agree together for 30 minutes.
The discussion centered on how "the oil companies spend 100% of the capital and assume 100% of the risk". The oil chap from Calgary commented on how the new Energy Minister needs to be a strong advocate FOR the oil companies, and that he should probably be from Calgary.
Anyhow, that gave me the creeps. I'm still smarting from the election, but since we're about as far as we can be from the next one I will be watching with great interest how the current govt will handle this............
Me too Jonathan - I will be watching with great interest on how the government will handle this. The Cabinet appointment is the key and the new Deputy Minister is the next most important thing.
ReplyDeleteAnd the portfolio nearest and dearest to my heart......K-12 Education, I am seriously wondering who might get it. AND specifically where they will take things now that the 5-year agreement has been reached.
ReplyDeleteKen, any thoughts on whether there will be a Culture portfolio?
Pardon me, Ken, for thinking Stelmach's pronouncement was just mere rhetoric. His actions so far (skipping an environmental conference amongst the premiers and putting forth a climate change plan that's even weaker then Harper and Baird's discredited plan) lead me to have no confidence in his ability to see that he believes what he said.
ReplyDeleteI understand your position Scott...he did not skip the Premier's Conference but did leave his Envir Min to handle any CC issues...I agree I may be splitting hairs and it was not the best approach given the seriousness of the climate change issues.
ReplyDeleteAlberta needs a transformative policy approach to the environment. Enlightened Alberta industry and citizens are there for sure...the CEMA letter shows that to be the case.
I know there are lots of big policy efforts are in process including new ideas like CO2 capture and sequestration, major and integrated water and air strategies, cummulative affects and a land use management including a land set off strategy due to oil sands development. Also a land acquisition for a high speed rail link between Edmonton and Calgary is in process and that happening will help alot for GHG reducions in the transportation area.
I think Stelmach has a start on a more pronounced and profound environmental approach. He needs to be bolder and more transformative with a greater sense of urgency about the environment pressures the province is facing all over and at all levels and sectors of society.
Albertans are there already and they need to show him that is what they want to get it higher on the policy agenda. Dressing up as a polar bear gets a picture in the paper but not much real change where it is needed...at the Cabinet table.
What? Stelmach has specifically said he "won't put the brake on oilsands development" - that is hardly saying the environment triumphs the economy....if he actually believed that, he has misled the public.
ReplyDeleteStelmach specifically said he would protect our resources in the event of a federal liberal government. I will take honest eddy at his word.
Stelmach said and believed both things Anon - can you handle the complexity?
ReplyDeleteI agree with you, Ken, that the cabinet selections will be critical. In the last few years portfolios of environmental significance (Environment, Sustainable Resource Development, Parks in its various incarnations) have tended to go to Ministers who were either deadwood (Mike Cardinal, Dave Coutts), or political outsiders (Zwozdesky at the time, Morton, though he proved to be stronger and more competent than anyone esle who has held the SRD portfolio). Stelmach has the opportunity to signal his government is serious about environmental issues by appointing heavy-hitters to these portfolios, those who will have the political weight to contend with the Energy Minister, Municipal Affairs, and the others who generally either ignore or disparage environmental concerns.
ReplyDeleteWhere IS that land-use policy we've been waiting on for the last 20 years, or so?
ReplyDeleteAny ideas, Ken?
CH - I don't know were you get the idea of 20 years has passed by on developmetn of a land use policy. I know of aobut 2 year for expert and stakeholder input efforts. The land use framework consultation is done and the document is all ready to go throught the public policy development process.
ReplyDeleteIt was supposed to go to Cabinet in Feb and then the election was called so it did not get to Cabinet before the Writ.
I believe it will go to Cabinet very shortly (once Cabinet is appointed sometime next week) and then it will be released publically for feedback.
I expect all this to happen before the end of April but that is a guess.
Ken, while I was exaggerating, my point was that we should have had an operable land-use framework before the massive amounts of industrial growth we've seen in this province. The last thirteen years have been a virtual free-for-all in terms of a complete lack of a comprehensive plan for development. While I welcome a land-use framework now, it is important to emphasize it won't fix past mistakes.
ReplyDeleteAlso do you think we will ever see an independent, scientific cumulative environmental impact assessment for the Fort Mac-Wood Buffalo region or for Edmonton's upgrader alley? That's just as an important in my view as a land-use framework.
I thought the Journal reported that Morton already brought the framework to cabinet, but it was so bad they sent him back to the drawing board?
Anon @ 8:08 - Tell me about it..I was one of the authors of the RMWB 2005 Business Case on the public infrastrucure needs in the region -which was an update of an earlier version.
ReplyDeleteWe took it to SPC in May 2005 and got a good reception. Boutillier - the MLA for the area tried to kill the SPC presentation but wiser people in government prevailed and the Business case was presented...and then shelved and not acted upon - Boutillier never championed it inside government form anything I can tell.
Bureaucrats at an EUB hearing last year admitted, under cross examination from the lawyers for the municipality, that the Klein government did not even review the Business Case content and recommendations in anyway.
If you wnat to read the Business Case it is on the Cambridge Strategies website.
www.cambridgestrategies.com
That is astonishing and this kind of such inattention is much of the cause for the chaos up i fort McMurray today.
Stelmach committed about $900M of new money into RMWB in his first year as Premier - and that is a good start.
Stelmach he ordered and is acting upon two excellent reports by former Deputy Miniser Doug Radke on what need to be done to respond to growth demands in Edmonton and Ft Mc. Another good planning move.
Land Use Framework was not yet taken to Cabinet according to my conversation in January with the ADM in charge of the project.